Contents

Friday, 30 July 2010

Nocton Dairies Ltd - informal meeting

Presentation of new plan


The following has been posted on the Village Hall noticeboard:

NOCTON DAIRIES

An informal meeting

DROP IN & VIEW PROPOSED PLANS

ON

FRIDAY AUGUST 6th: 6pm - 8.30pm

SATURDAY AUGUST 7th: 8am - 2pm

AT

WOOD FARM, DUNSTON FEN, LN4 3AP.

 
Nocton Dairies Ltd
Higher Alminstone Farm
Woolsery
Bideford
North Devon
EX39 5PX

Tel: 01237 431246
Fax: 01237 431820

27th July 2010

Mrs D Green
1 Potterhanworth Rd
Nocton
Lincoln
LN4 2BP

Dear Doreen,

We would like to invite the residents of Nocton and Dunston to Woodside Farm Cottage, Nocton on the following dates:

  • Friday 6th August 2010 between 6.00pm and 8.30pm
  • Saturday 7th August 2010 between 8.00am and 2.00pm.

The purpose of this meeting is to involve all the local people that have concerns over our plans for the dairy on Nocton Heath.

Mr Graeme Sutees and Mr Peter Willes will be attending throughout the two days and will be discussing present thoughts on how the plans for the dairy will be represented to the council in the near future.

One of the questions to you will be what could be done in terms of community benefits for Nocton and Dunston? We will then view suggestions and put forward a beneficial proposal to the community, which also fits in with our business.

Yours sincerely

Nocton Dairies Ltd

Directors: DA Barnes & PA Willes
Company Reg No: 06970038
VAT Reg No: 978 3756 52

My thoughts 


Firstly:
  • Why haven't residents from other potential affected villages been invited to attend e.g. Blankney, Branston, Metheringham, Potterhanworth, Scopwick?
Secondly:
  • According to my OS map, Wood Farm, Dunston Fen Lane, Dunston is the building in the left of the clearing at the bottom of Nocton Wood: OS Explorer 272 - Grid Ref: 083633

Nocton Parish Council - new Councillor

Councillor MaryAnn Williams


The following is displayed on the Village Hall noticeboard:

ELECTION OF A COUNCILLOR
FOR THE
PARISH OF NOCTON

THURSDAY 29TH JULY 2010

RESULT OF UNCONTESTED ELECTION

I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that at the election of a councillor for the parish of Nocton, the following person stood validly nominated at the latest time for the delivery of notices of withdrawal, namely noon on Wednesday 7th July 2010 and were duly elected as a parish councillor for the said parish without a contest.

NAMES OF PERSON            ELECTED PLACE OF RESIDENCE

MARY ANN WILLIAMS              WILDERNESS COTTAGE
                                                       THE GREEN
                                                       NOCTON
                                                       LN4 2BG

Dated: 7th day of July 2010

Ian Fytche
Returning Officer

Wednesday, 28 July 2010

Nocton Fen Farms - anaerobic digester

Anaerobic Digester to be built at Nocton Fen


A Lincolnshire Echo article appears to confirm that planning permission has been granted for an anaerobic digester on Nocton Fen.

Green power plant given green light by Lincoln County Council Planning Committee.

Nocton Fen Farms appears to be part of Carrington Farms - an all-arable enterprise that was created when a group of Danish farmers decided to invest in UK land, with James Thompson being recruited to manage the business.

More on James Thompson here.

Carrington Farms is in two locations - 1,520ha at Nocton Fen Farms and 2,050ha at Carrington Farms itself.  The company also has further land which it rents.
[Source: Crop Production Magazine - Sept 2008]

Carrington Farms located in Carrington near Boston, recently opened its gates to the public for Open Farm Sunday 2010 (13th June). It was an opportunity to meet the farmers who grow your food and care for the countryside.

Sunday, 25 July 2010

Nocton Dairies Ltd - letter to Parish Council

Lobbying the Parish Council


You may be interested in a letter I have sent to our local Parish Council - see below:

Ms Elaine Storr (Chairperson)
Nocton Parish Council
C/O Mrs Doreen Green (Clerk)

25th July 2010

Dear Ms Storr,

Nocton Dairies Ltd – Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Review – 10/0831 EIASCO

I see Dunston Parish Council have prepared an excellent response to the above application on behalf of their residents. I would like to request that our own Nocton Parish Council consider something similar within the timeframe allowed for comment.

I have the following information that may help form discussion points for your Councillors:
  • This development is going to be an industrial site, not a farm in any sense of the word. It will be operating 24 hours per day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, with all the related impact to residents living in the vicinity and along the supply routes to this facility.
  • The revised plans show an increase to the number of large slurry lagoons on Nocton/Dunston Heath... increased from one to three... and this could yet be increased even more.
  • It should be noted that the applicants are now intending to use mobile, overland, umbilical pipes for the dispersal of slurry, rather than underground pipes. These umbilical pipes are in no way foolproof, being vulnerable to damage by abrasion and puncture from stony/flinty ground, with the possible resulting pollution to the fragile aquifer.
  • This industrial site is estimated to produce in the region of 567,000 litres of slurry PER DAY for 8,100 cows and it is paramount this be disposed of safely. Much of the effluent produced will be dispersed on land surrounding our villages. Is it not reasonable for us to ask for a conditional exclusion zone (perhaps 1km) from property, given that spraying/spreading of effluent can legally be as close as 6 metres to property boundaries?
  • The impact from dispersal of effluent on the populous requires careful consideration from a public health standpoint. There is evidence that particulates in the air can exacerbate breathing problems for people suffering from asthma and similar complaints. Is it reasonable to allow this near villages?
  • Tests can be carried out on air samples for ammonia and hydrogen sulphide that arise from slurry lagoons. Odour transects can be conducted using a field olfactometer. Perhaps these need to be made a condition of any construction of lagoons so close to a village? Also, the requirement for an impermeable cover will significantly reduce ambient concentrations of ammonia and hydrogen sulphide from the lagoon, thus reducing significantly any odours in the surrounding area.
  • The Anaerobic Digester will not be operational until Year 2 and therefore untreated slurry will need to be disposed of during the first year at least. There is no guarantee the Anaerobic Digester will in fact be constructed unless it is made a condition of the planning approval.
  • In any case, ‘Digesters are only marginally effective at reducing problems with odors, pathogens and greenhouse gas emissions from animal waste or sewage sludge, but they are incapable of making any chemical contaminants in the wastes go away. Digesters aren't emissions-free. They are known to emit nitrogen and sulfur oxides, particulate matter, carbon monoxide and ammonia. Living next to a digester could be unpleasant, particularly if located in a residential neighborhood or if the facility would be large.’ See here.
  • The fresh water requirement for 8,100 cows is estimated to be between 1,100,000 and 1,800,000 litres PER DAY. This is likely to be sourced by pumping from the River Witham, by abstraction from underground resources and also from normal water supply. In a low rainfall area and with the world’s water resources dwindling, can we really afford this amount of water for an industrial concern when there is a need to guarantee a reliable supply of fresh drinking water for human needs?
  • The access and egress to the dairy is still shown as joining the B1188 which is a Red Route. There is a need for a detailed assessment of traffic flow, hour-by-hour for vehicles servicing this industrial site.

These are just some basic points that need to be considered... there are many more issues which if fully researched will highlight potential problems and inform your paper.

I would be grateful if you would ensure our Councillors discuss this most pressing issue with the utmost urgency and prepare a response at the earliest opportunity.

Yours sincerely,

GMHall

Thursday, 22 July 2010

Nocton Dairies Ltd - background

How did the Nocton Dairy project come about?


The Nocton Estate comprised 2,835 ha (7,000 acres) when it was purchased by Nocton Limited back in 1995. At that time it was very much an ongoing agricultural concern, but in year 2000 the growing of potatoes was phased out, as was the growing of sugar beet. Much of the crops were replaced with the growing of daffodil bulbs and flowers.

In 2007, Nocton Limited sold approximately 60% of the Nocton Estate's farmland (much of it fenland) to a Danish buyer, leaving roughly 2,800 acres in the ownership of Nocton Limited. A further 340 acres was advertised for sale with Grange Farm in June 2009 and Nocton Dairies Limited (incorporated 22 July 2009) decided to purchase this asset as possibly one of its first transactions.

I must at this point emphasize that Nocton Limited and Nocton Dairies Limited are two entirely separate companies under different ownership.

Nocton Dairies Ltd then made an offer for almost all the remaining Nocton Estate still owned by Nocton Ltd (circa 2,400 acres). The land and five properties were purchased in December 2009, leaving one remaining asset from the old Nocton Estate days. The old Estate Yard and agricultural buildings at the railhead in Nocton comprising of 16.1 ha (40 acres) still remain in the ownership of Nocton Ltd.

Who is behind the Nocton Dairies project?


Nocton Dairies is a company formed by a Devon farmer and cheese-maker, Peter Willes... and a Lancashire milk producer from Clitheroe, David Barnes.

After securing the purchase of the Nocton Estate land, an approach was then made to a local farmer, Robert Howard. Robert left a banking career to join the long-standing family business and has indicated his intention to make available 639 ha (approx 1,580 acres) of land and irrigation facilities to Nocton Dairies Ltd.

Why is this extra land and irrigation needed?


A 700kg cow produces about 70 litres of slurry per day... 567,000 litres per day for 8,100 cows. This amount of slurry effluent requires careful disposal. An old 'rule of thumb' was half an acre per cow for spring, one acre per cow for summer and 1.5 acres per cow in autumn if stockpiling forages.

However, many factors affect land requirements, depending on the maximum rate of nitrogen application per acre of land and whether it is in a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone. Sometimes, much more than half an acre per lactating cow is required.

Considering Nocton Dairies Ltd recently applied for planning permission to build an intensive dairy (February 2010), potentially housing 8,100 head of dairy cattle, do the math.

If Nocton Dairies Ltd own approximately 2,760 acres in Lincolnshire, even if one accepts that only half an acre per cow is required for spreading of slurry, they are still well short of their minimum requirement. Access to extra land will therefore be required.

It was noticeable from the original planning application that not only had Robert Howard expressed his intention to make available land and irrigation facilities, other farmers in the locality had also done likewise.

David Knott of Patrick Dean Ltd, Bracebridge Heath had also signed a document confirming his intention to make available 2,183 acres for the spreading of dairy effluent. There was an offer to make available his reservoir water for irrigation purposes as well.

Additionally, Tim Banks of Blankney Estates, Blankney had signed a similar document expressing an intention to make available 4,449 ha (11,117 acres) of land for the spreading of dairy effluent and three reservoirs for irrigation.

On the face of it, it is only through these voluntary offers of intent that Nocton Dairies Ltd will have sufficient land available for the spreading of the substantial amount of waste produced by their dairy cows.

There is also the issue of sufficient access to water supplies. The water abstraction licences resting with the local farmers will also be invaluable. Considering lactating Holstein cows require between 30 - 40 gallons per day for drinking (if you include waste management 40 - 50 gallons per day), get your head around these figures... that's between 243,000 gallons and 405,000 gallons PER DAY for 8,100 cows!

Collaboration between farming concerns is not new - see here. Where there are economies of scale it makes common sense. For Nocton Dairies Ltd it seems it is a must.

How is the dairy industry reacting to the public outcry to Nocton Dairies Ltd initial application?


A visit to the US was arranged for a number of UK dairy representatives by Kite Consulting and the NFU - see here.

It might be interesting to list those who were selected for this trip, particularly whether anyone connected with Nocton Dairies was in attendance. We will be considering doing this in due course and will report here again if so.

So what next?

It remains to be seen when the revised application will be submitted. As reported on this blog, the next phase is already in its formative stage... with the current application for an Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Review.

If you are a local resident, you may like to consider the potential impacts this intensive dairy poses and whether or not you wish to form a response when the planning application is received by North Kesteven District Council.

Finally, you may like to be made aware of other related planning applications in this vicinity that may possibly affect you, although a couple have been withdrawn for the time-being, namely:
  • Lincolnshire County Council: To construct a 1.08Mw Anaerobic Digestion Unit to include the building of six tanks and associated piping, a technical house, roadway upgrading and extension and 3 sided walling of an existing dutch barn and concrete hardstanding. Application No: N42/0206/10. Mr Robert Beck.
  • North Kesteven District Council: Construction of winter storage reservoir. Application No: 10/0166/FUL. Nocton Dairies Ltd.
  • North Kesteven District Council: To lay an underground pipe from Mere Pumphouse (north of Mere Hall Bracebridge Heath) to Boothby Heath Farm for Agricultural purposes... under Nocton Heath. Application No: 10/0486/FUL. Patrick Dean Ltd. Mr David Knott.
  • North Kesteven District Council: Change of use of redundant agricultural buildings to commercial/industrial warehouse uses (use Classes B1, B2 & B8). Application No: 10/0641/FUL. Nocton Ltd. Mr Paul Clarke.
You may wish to subscribe to http://www.caffo.co.uk/ or check back here regularly for more information.

Saturday, 17 July 2010

Nocton Hall - thefts

Two men prosecuted


Two men discovered removing roof tiles from Nocton Hall have been successfully prosecuted.  Hopefully, this will be a warning to others who trespass and steal from our local heritage.

For the full report see here.

Friday, 16 July 2010

RAF Nocton Hall - RedDogFilm

Filming in Nocton


Interesting... wandering past the old hospital site this morning, my wife noticed a marquee and caravan... and a number of people hanging around.  Warning notices were on the gates advising that official passes were required to enter the site.

After chatting to the occupants for a short while, it appears RedDogFilm  are using the location for filming their most ambitious production yet 'Goodie'.

Best use of the site since its dereliction I feel.

Friday, 9 July 2010

Nocton Dairies Ltd - scoping request

Environmental Impact Assessment


I see that Nocton Dairies have submitted an EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) scoping request to North Kesteven District Council (Ref: 10/0831/EIASCO) in relation to the 8,100 cow intensive dairy on Nocton Heath dated 1st July 2010. Presumably this is a precursor to a resubmission of a fresh planning application in the next month or so.

If the reason for withdrawal was concern over the potential leakage of effluent to the fragile aquifer under Nocton Heath, then it would appear the pipelines linking the lagoons will be a critical consideration.

Following research, I have discovered that double-skinned pipelines are available that will mitigate any risk. These type of pipes are common in the oil/chemical industry - see here.

N.B. Look under 'Environmental Awareness' for how these function.

If Nocton Dairies are serious in their wish to avoid potential damage to our fragile environment, one would expect them to install the best equipment available to avoid such an eventuality. It begs a question as to whether the Environmental Agency will recommend the installation of such piping and whether Planning Committee will endorse this with stipulation. If not, then what will suffice?

Nocton Dairies could decide to seek permission to use single-skinned umbilical slurry pipes on the surface, but these have to be transported around site with all the potential for nitrate ground contamination. Otherwise the waste will have to be tankered into position with a similar risk of spillage. This source would then need to be coupled to slurry injection equipment. See here for a typical example.

There may also be an argument to counter any accidental spillage by planting nitrate-reducing crops, but would this be an acceptable quid pro quo?

If an umbilical piping system is used, do local residents really want huge reels of pipes and specialist injector equipment moving frequently through local villages? The alternative will be slurry bowsers shackled to the back of tractors.


One can only hope that the necessary regulatory authorities carry out their risk assessments diligently and set limitations in place accordingly.

Other Guidance

SSAFO - Slurry reception pits and in-situ or above ground slurry stores or tanks
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Business/SSAFO_Factsheet_1.pdf

SSAFO - Low-rate slurry irrigation systems
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Business/SSAFO_Factsheet_4.pdf

SSAFO - Earth bank slurry stores and tanks
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Business/SSAFO_Factsheet_5.pdf

DEFRA - Manure Management Plan
http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/docs/forms/agri_env/nvz/manureplan.pdf


National Farmer's Union Online - Dairy News


This is a useful site for keeping you up to date on all things dairy.

A recent article 'US Dairy Trip - dairy farming super-sized' actually makes a short reference to Nocton Dairies - see here.

The article mentions that "Wisconsin is probably the closest state in terms of the size, structure and geography of its dairy industry to Great Britain"... yet "as an industry, dairy farms in Wisconsin face a number of issues, including:
1. Large farm sitings (planning, public concerns over noise, odours, manures, government regulations for large units).
2. Environmental issues (water and energy use, nutrient planning)".

Since these are some of the major concerns we have about the intensive dairy industry, why did the article not venture into more explanation.  It is important that we have a full and frank debate about all issues, before these type of development are allowed to change the face of our dairy farming, perhaps for ever.

Perhaps Hayley Campbell-Gibbons (the NFU's chief dairy adviser) didn't want the more negative aspects of intensive dairying on show for all to see?  Mmmm... now I wonder why?

Wednesday, 7 July 2010

Nocton Parish Council - report

Parish business cancelled


A disappointing meeting last night where there were insufficient Councillors in attendance to form a quorem and thus unable to conduct Parish business.

Six members of the public also attended, as well as the Police Community Support Officer and District Councillor.

The Chairperson Elaine Storr cancelled the meeting and carried forward the business until the next meeting due Tuesday 3rd August.

Monday, 5 July 2010

Nocton Dairies Ltd - concerned

You should be


After spending two weeks away in Europe celebrating the centenary of Alfa Romeo, I return to the UK to find the Nocton Dairies debate alive and well.

The Daily Mail have today published an article discussing issues that impact from this style of mega-dairy.

It makes for uncomfortable reading. If local residents were not concerned before, perhaps they might be now?